The New York Times: The Morning
Fighting racism, quietly.
Views expressed in this geopolitical summary are those of the reporters and correspondents.
Accessed on 30 November 2021, 1237 UTC.
Content provided by email subscription to "The New York Times."
Please click link or scroll down to read your selections.
Thanks for joining us today.
Good morning. The Ahmaud Arbery trial offers lessons for American politics.
Words and deeds
The most effective way to achieve racial justice can sometimes be to downplay race.
That may seem like a counterintuitive idea. And it can certainly feel unsatisfying to people who are committed to reducing the toll of racism in the United States. But it is one of the lessons of the murder convictions last week of three white men in Georgia, in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man.
I want to revisit the case this morning, because it has a broader relevance to American politics.
By now, you’re probably familiar with the basic facts. Arbery was in a predominantly white neighborhood near his home in coastal Georgia on Feb. 23, 2020, when three men in pickup trucks chased and shot him.
Racism played a clear role in the killing. One of the defendants used a slur shortly after the shooting, according to another defendant. All three had a history of sending online messages tinged with white nationalism.
Nonetheless, the prosecutor in the case, Linda Dunikoski, decided mostly to ignore race during the trial. She accused the defendants of having a racist motive only once, in a single line of her closing argument. She instead portrayed them as lawless figures who killed a young man.
Before the verdicts, some observers criticized the strategy, saying that Dunikoski was weakening her case by ignoring the defendants’ motive. “There were a lot of people who thought that it should have been very central to her argument,” said The Times’s Richard Fausset, who covered the killing and the trial. One law professor accused Dunikoski of “whitewashing” the facts. Another professor said that her strategy would be blamed if the defendants were acquitted.
No doubt, it would have been. Dunikoski was deliberately leaving out a big part of the story. But she was doing so for a reason. (Or so it seems; she has not publicly discussed her strategy.) She evidently believed that emphasizing race would be a gift to the defense.
It could cause the jurors — all but one of whom were white — to retreat to their ideological corners. Conservative jurors would be reminded that they often disagree with allegations of racism. Many political moderates disagree sometimes, too, especially if they’re white. On the other hand, any jurors likely to be appalled by the racial nature of the case — three white men killing a Black man in broad daylight — would recognize the role of race without needing to be told about it.
The anti-Bannon strategy
It was a miniature version of a tension that runs through American politics.
Progressive activists often point out — accurately — the central role that race and racism play in the U.S. Polls show, for example, that a large percentage of Americans feel racial animus. That animus helped fuel Donald Trump’s political rise, starting with his promotion of the lie that Barack Obama was born in Africa. And racial discrimination continues to shape our economy, schools, criminal justice system and more.
Yet when activists try to combat racism by calling it out, they often struggle to accomplish their goals. Focusing on Trump’s racist behavior did not keep him from winning the presidency. The Black Lives Matter movement has mostly failed to implement its policy agenda on policing. Affirmative-action programs generally lose when they appear on the ballot — including a landslide loss in California last year, helped by opposition from many Latino and Asian voters.
Race-based strategies are especially challenging in a country where living standards have stagnated in recent decades: Working-class families of all races have reason to distrust the notion that they enjoy a privileged lifestyle. No wonder that Steve Bannon, the far-right political figure, once said that he wanted liberals “to talk about racism every day.” When they do, Bannon said, “I got ’em.”
‘Attack the design’
The Arbery trial offers a reminder that calling out racism is not the only way to battle it. Sometimes, a more effective approach involves appealing to universal notions of fairness and justice.
Another example is child poverty. Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey was an early advocate of baby bonds — universal savings accounts for children, an idea that helped shape President Biden’s focus on reducing child poverty. The beauty of the policy, Booker told me, is that it substantially reduces racial gaps in child poverty (because children of color are more likely to be poor) while still being inclusive.
“It’s very hard to undo centuries of racial policies by suddenly saying, ‘I’m now going to not be conscious of race in America,’” he said. But, he added, “This is a policy that I think can be embraced by you, whoever you are, whatever your background.”
Representative James Clyburn, the highest ranking Black Democrat in Congress, made a similar argument when explaining why he favored a version of slavery reparations that would also help poor white families. “Race is the reason income is what it is,” he told The Washington Post. “This is by design. So attack the design.”
The downside of this approach is clear enough. Given the long history of intense racism in the U.S., universal programs will never fully solve the problem. Of course, policies that fail to get enacted accomplish much less.
Dunikoski’s trial strategy may have felt uncomfortable to anybody repulsed by the defendants’ racism. But imagine how uncomfortable an acquittal would have felt.
Arbery’s family members, notably, were not among Dunikoski’s critics, as Richard Fausset has reported. Even before the verdict, the family liked the prosecution’s approach.
For more: On “The Daily,” Richard broke down the trial in more detail, with help from courtroom audio clips.
THE LATEST NEWS
|Other Big Stories|
Three views as the Supreme Court prepares to hear a case that could restrict abortion rights:
Charles Fried once urged the court to overturn Roe v. Wade. Now he thinks doing so would be “an act of constitutional vandalism.”
Roe may fall even as conservatives have adopted the “my body, my choice” slogan, Michelle Goldberg writes.
“Abortion is a form of killing”: Ross Douthat makes the pro-life case.
The mission of The New York Times is to seek the truth and help people understand the world. That is only possible with the help of subscribers. Support our work today.
Horse troughs and hot tubs: Baptism is getting a little wild.
Invasion: Bradford pears were the ideal tree for the suburbs. Then they started taking over.
The Bachelor: Colton Underwood wants to make amends.
Advice from Wirecutter: Become a better gift giver.
Lives Lived: Before he became, at 40, the first African American golfer to play in the Masters, Lee Elder toured the Southwest as a hustler, winning private bets against players who had no idea how good he was. He died at 87.
ARTS AND IDEAS
Everything Virgil Abloh did
There was the black tennis tutu for Serena Williams at the U.S. Open in 2018, and the custom harness Timothée Chalamet wore on the red carpet. There were seemingly endless designs featuring quotation marks, and sneakers playfully adorned with security tags. But those were just the objects; the legacy of their designer, Virgil Abloh, extends far beyond material goods.
Abloh, who died on Sunday at 41 of a rare cancer, was the artistic director of Louis Vuitton men’s wear and the founder of his own line, Off-White. Only a few months ago, he took on a more expansive role at LVMH, making him the most powerful Black executive in the most powerful luxury group in the world, The Times’s Vanessa Friedman writes.
With degrees in engineering and architecture, Abloh was a latecomer to fashion. Growing up, he embraced skate culture and hip-hop, and their influences were clear in his work. “He wasn’t known for his mastery of fashion’s technical skills, but he understood popular culture and what it meant to move through the world using clothing as a signifier of belonging,” Robin Givhan writes in The Washington Post.
Abloh’s approach transformed men’s wear. As Rachel Tashjian writes in GQ: “The industry currently operates in the mold he created — collaboration crazy, streetwear heavy, pairing unlikely businesses and talents together, treating brands like Evian and Arc’teryx as sacred and intriguing as any luxury house, and cultivating a community rather than mere customers.”
“Look around at the way young men now think about clothes, design and music, and the ways in which those pursuits all intersect,” Jon Caramanica writes in The Times. “It’s hard not to see Abloh everywhere.” — Sanam Yar, a Morning writer
PLAY, WATCH, EAT
|What to Cook|
These cherry rugelach are tender and coated with cardamom sugar.
|What to Watch|
Move over, “Friends.” Step aside, “The Office.” Twitch and YouTube streamers are becoming the go-to for comfort viewing.
|What to Listen to|
Adele, Summer Walker, Taylor Swift: It’s the season of raw albums about romantic discontent.
The hosts had a lot to say about Omicron.
|Now Time to Play|
The pangram from yesterday’s Spelling Bee was motivation. Here is today’s puzzle — or you can play online.
Here’s today’s Mini Crossword, and a clue: Bee injury (five letters).
If you’re in the mood to play more, find all our games here.
Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David
P.S. Join The Times Book Review for the unveiling of this year’s 10 Best Books, today at 9 a.m. Eastern.
Here’s today’s print front page.
“The Daily” is about Omicron.
Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti, Ashley Wu and Sanam Yar contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at email@example.com.